>

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Arboricultural Association.

Share this story

Topics

#ARBatwork #ArbMatters #EmbraceEquity #IWD2023 #PledgeLessPlastic #WomenInArb #WomenInTrees & 12 Faces of Arb 1987 storm 2 Rope 2018 2024 30 Under 30 3ATC 3ATC UK Open 50th annual 60 years AA AA award AA Awards Aboricultural Association abstracts Accident accreditation Addiction advice AFAG AFL aftercare AGM Agrilus Biguttatus AI aid air quality Alert Alex Kirkley All Party Parliamentary Group on Horticulture amenity Amenity Conference Anatomy Ancient Tree Forum Annual Awards Anthropology APF APF 2020 APF 2022 APHA app APPGHG application Appointment apprentice apprenticeship Apprenticeships Approved Approved Contractor Approved Contractors ARB ARB Approved Contractor ARB Approved Contractors ARB at work ARB Magazine ARB Salaries ARB Show arb training ARB Worker Zone ArbAC ARBatwork ArbCamp Arbor Day Arboretum Arboricultural Association Arboricultural Journal Arboricultural Student Arboriculture arborists Arbsafe Artificial Intelligence Ash Ash Archive ash dieback Asian Hornet Assessments Assessors at atf ATO Australia Autumn Review award Awards Barcham Trees Bark Beetle Bartlett Bartlett Tree Experts bats Bats & Trees beetle Benjamin Zephaniah Best Student Best Student Award beyond ism Bill Matthews biochar biodiversity Biodiversity Net Gain biomechanical biosecurity Birmingham TreePeople BNG Book Prize Book Shop Booking Books Bookshop boundaries branch Branches brand Brexit BS3857 bs5837 BSI Budgeting Tool bursary business Butterflies Call for Abrstacts Call for Abstracts Call for papers Campout Canker stain of plane Canopy Climbing Collective carbon career careers Cavanagh CAVAT CCS Cellular Confinement Cellular Confinement Systems CEnv CEO Ceratocystis Ceratocystis platani chainsaw Chair chalara charity Charles charter Charter for Trees Chartered Environmentalist chelsea Chelsea Flower Show City & Guilds Claus Mattheck climate climate change climber climbing code Cofor Colleges committees Community Tree Nurseries competition competiton conference Conference India Confor conifers conservation Consultant consultation Continuous Professional Development Contractor Contractor Focus Contractors Cornwall Cornwall Branch Coronation Coronavirus Coroner Council Countryside Countryside Code Countryside Stewardship Course for beginners COVID-19 CPD cross industry news Crown & Canopy Cryphonectria parasitica Cumbria DART Date for your diary David Lonsdale deadwood death debate Debt defra deployment Design Devon Director disease diversity DMM document donate dothistroma Douglas Fir downloads Dr David Lonsdale draft Drought Dutch elm DWP EAC East Anglia ecology Economic Report economy Ecotricity education EFUF e-Learning Election elections Electricity Elm yellows Emerald Ash Borer England England Tree Action Plan England Tree Strategy English Elm environment Environment Act 2021 environmental EPF Equality equipment Equipment Theft Europe European Arboricultural Council European Forum on Urban Forestry European standards European Wood Pastures EUSTAFOR Event exeter Exhibition Exhibitors Fall from Height Fatal Fatality felling Fellow Fellow Members Fera Field Trip Finance Fine firewood First Aid FISA flood flooding for Forest Research forestry Forestry Commission Forestry England forests freelancers FSC Fund4Trees funding fundraiser fungal fungi Future Flora Futurebuild gardening GDPR GenAI General Election Geocells Gold Medal Gov.uk government grant grants Grapple Saws Green Brexit Green Infrastructure Green Infratructure Green Recovery Green Up Greneda relief Guarantee guidance Guidance Note Guidance Note 2 guide guides Hazard Tree Health heart-rot Heatwave Hedgerow hedges height Helliwell Help Henry Girling Henry Kuppen History HMRC HOMED Homeworking Honey Brothers Honey Fungus honours Horse Chestnut HortAid horticulture horticulturists HortWeek housing HRH HRH Prince Charles HS2 HSE HTA ICF ICoP identification Immigration import industry Industry Code of Practice industry skills Infographic InfraGreen Initiatives Inspiration Institute of Charterd Foresters Insurance Intermediate Tree Inspection International Urban Forestry Congress International Women’s Day International Year of Plant Health invertebrates Investigating Tree Archaeology Conference IPAF Ips Ips typographus Irma irrigation ISA iso ITCC i-Tree IUFC IWD21 Jo Hedger Job Job Centre Plus job opportunity Jobcentre Plus jobs judgement JustGiving Karabiner Keith Sacre Kent Kew King’s Award for Enterprise Kit Knot-Tying competition land-based Landsaping Landscape Institute Landscape Recovery Scheme Landscape Show landscaping Lantra law Leaf Minor Lectures legal legislation Letters Liability licence Local Authority Treescapes Fund London longevity LTOA Lynne Boddy Magazine Malawi Managegement Plan manifesto maple Mayor of London MBE Melbourne Member Benefit Member Survey Membership Mental Health mentor MEWPs Midlands Morphophysiology moth' motion Moulton College Myerscough NASA National Geographic National Hedgerow Week National Tree Safety Group National Tree Week NATO Natural England NatureScot Netherlands New Year’s Honours News NHS nominations Northern Northumberland Notice notification NTIS NTOA NTOC NTSG Nurseries nursery trees oak 'oak Oak Processionary Moth Oak-boring Beetle obituary Observatree occupation of OHRG On-Demand online opm Padua Papua parks parliament Past Awards Past Chairs Perennial Pest Alert pests Pests & Diseases Pests and Diseases Petersfield petition Petzl photo Phytophthora Phytophthora pluvialis Pine Processionary Moth plan planning Planning Law Plant Health Plant Healthy planting Plantsman Plantsmans Choice Pledge Plumpton College policy poll Poster Power PPE practice Preston Twins Prince Charles Prince of Wales processionary Product Recall Professional Members prosecution Protect and Survive protected tree protection PUWER Qualifications Queen’s 70th Jubilee Questionnaire Quotatis ramorum RC Recruitment Red Diesel reference Reg Harris Registered Registered Consultant Registered Consultants Rehab Rememberance Day renewal REnvP Report Rescue research Research grant Resilience response results Retirement retrenchment review RFS rhs RHS Chelsea Flower Show Ride for Research Ride4Research rigging Rodney Helliwell rogue tree surgeons Royal Forestry Society RSFS Safe Working Practice Safety Safety Bulletin Safety Bulletins Safety Guides Safety Notice Saftey Salaries Sale school science Scotland Scotland Branch Scottish Branch SDG Accord security Seed Gathering Season Seminar seminars Share Sheffield Show Sierra Leone Site Guidance skills skills survey SocEnv Social Benefits of Trees soil soils Sooty Bark South East South East Branch South West Speaker spotlight SRT SRWP staff Standards statement Stationary Rope Stationary Rope Technique statutory STIHL Stonehouse Storm strategy student Student Book Prize Student Conference Study Trip Sub-contractors Succession Successsion Supporter survey Sustainable Soils Alliance Sweet Chestnut sweet chestnut blight Sycamore Gap symposium T Level T Levels Tatarian maple TDAG Technical technical guide Technical Guides technical officer Technical Officers Technical Team Technician Members Technology Ted Green Telecommunications tender TG3 Thames & Chiltern The Arboricultural Association The Forestry and Woodlands Advisory Committees The Plantsman’s Choice The Queen’s Green Canopy The Woodland Trust Thinking Arbs Thinking Arbs Day Timbersports Tony Kirkham Tools top-handled chainsaws,Elcoat, TPBE4 TPO Trading Standards trailblazer training transport Tree Tree Care Tree Champion Tree Council Tree Fayre tree felling Tree Health Tree Health Week Tree Inspection Tree Life tree loss tree management Tree of the year Tree Officer Tree officers tree pathogen tree planning Tree Planting Tree Production Innovation Fund Tree Protection tree register Tree Risk Tree Shears tree species Tree Supply Tree Surgeon Tree Surgeons Tree Week Tree Work at Height Tree Workers Zone TreeAlert Treeconomics tree-felling TreeRadar trees trees' Trees & Society Trees & Sociey Trees and Society Trees and the Law Trees for Cities Trees, People and the Built Environment trust' trustee Trustees TrustMark Two Rope two-rope typographus UAG Uitlity UK favourite UK&ITCC ukas Ukraine UKWAS urban urban forest Urban Forestry Urban Tree Challenge Urban Tree Challenge Fund Urban Tree Cover Urban Tree Diversity Urban Tree World Cup urban trees UTD4 Utility Approved Contractors Utility Arboriculture Group UTWC vacancy Vanuatu VETcert veteran trees video Videos Virtual ARB Show volunteer voting VTA WAC Wales Wales Branch Warning Watering Watering Campaign watering solutions Watering Young Trees Webinar webinars website Wednesday Webinars Wellbeing Western Westonbirt Wharton White Paper Whitebeam WIA Witley Women Women in Arb women in arboriculture Womens Arb Camp woodland Woodland Carbon Code Woodland Carbon Guarantee woodland trust woods Work Work at Height Workshops World Environment Day World Fungi Day Xylella young Young Arboricultural Professional Young Arboricultural Professional Award Young Arboricultural Professional of the Year young arborists Young People’s Breakfast Event Young Tree Aftercare Youth Programme zoo

Sooty bark disease can no longer be ignored

Author:  Henry Kuppen
  16/01/2025
Last Updated:  31/01/2025

A report from Belgium and the Netherlands

Henry Kuppen, Terra Nostra

Since 2014, we have become more and more aware of the presence of sooty bark disease on maple trees in both Belgium and the Netherlands. In 2020, after three consecutive dry summer seasons, newly reported cases increased significantly in both countries.

The disease is especially affecting individual maple trees that are already in a deteriorating condition. The practical management of trees with sooty bark disease is still a tricky issue because of the potential health risks for those in charge of removing the tree who may thus inhale the spores. But this is no reason to panic. Fortunately, an updated protocol is now available.

Figure 1. A sooty bark disease spore factory that has just exploded. (© Henry Kuppen)

Figure 1. A sooty bark disease spore factory that has just exploded. (© Henry Kuppen)

Figure 2. Maple infected with sooty bark disease. (© Henry Kuppen)

Figure 2. Maple infected with sooty bark disease. (© Henry Kuppen)

Figure 3. Incidence of positively diagnosed sooty bark disease in Belgium and the Netherlands, 2014–20. (© Terra Nostra)

Figure 3. Incidence of positively diagnosed sooty bark disease in Belgium and the Netherlands, 2014–20. (© Terra Nostra)

Figure 4. Sooty bark disease spores on a stem. (© Henry Kuppen)

Figure 4. Sooty bark disease spores on a stem. (© Henry Kuppen)

Symptoms and identification

Sooty bark disease is caused by the fungus Cryptostroma corticale. This is a weakness parasite that enters the tree through wounds caused by external damage and/or pruning activities. The fungus is unable to penetrate intact bark or leaf scars. It settles in the woody structure of the tree and spreads vertically.

Trees may show no symptoms for a while as the fungus can be latent in the tree for a long period of time. In fact, during the latent phase, the visual features of sooty bark disease are not yet clearly present. Under optimal conditions, the fungus starts to spread horizontally and forms spores. Only then is the disease visible in the deterioration of the tree and spore formation on the trunk.

Spore development is mainly stimulated by a decline in the condition of the tree, prolonged drought and temperatures above 20˚C. Cryptostroma corticale is a real spore factory; it forms an incredible number of spores. The spore formation takes place directly under the cork cambium (the upper part of the bark) and can grow into an area up to 1cm thick, which gives the trunk a cellulite-like appearance (Fig. 4). The extremely delicate cork cambium then snaps and the spore pocket is released in the immediate vicinity, causing a sooty rash and jet black bark. The spore burst can be observed almost all year round (Figs 1 and 2). In addition, maples with sooty bark disease often show a characteristic spotty brown/green discolouration in the wood that disappears when the disease is expanding (Fig. 4).

To be sure that a maple is affected by sooty bark disease, the spores must be analysed to determine whether they match a specific set of morphological characteristics. Relying on first-sight visual assessments may lead to false conclusions. In fact, 50% of the samples processed by Terra Nostra show no traces of sooty bark disease. After diagnosis, precautions can be taken to ensure safe tree management. Given the latent nature of the disease, it is advisable to prioritise the removal of maples which are in an irreversibly bad condition and have no characteristics of sooty bark disease, in order to prevent the tree from developing it at a later time.

Preferred tree species and distribution

The disease is mainly diagnosed on sycamore, Acer pseudoplatanus. In 2020, it was also identified four times by Terra Nostra on Norway maple, Acer platanoides, and only once on Acer platanoides ‘Crimson King’. In the past, after experimental inoculation, the disease developed on 14 maple species including A. saccharinum and A. negundo. Halfway through the last century, the disease was also sporadically diagnosed on birch (Betula), linden (Tilia), and hickory (Carya). However, infection of these genera does not seem to be an issue at this moment. The fungus is originally from North America and has previously been found in Western and Central Europe, mainly in urban environments. However, forest areas now also appear to be affected on a larger scale. For instance, thousands of trees have died in a short time in Germany due to sooty bark disease.

The fungus reproduces asexually and spores can spread across long distances on the wind. As anticipated due to the previous dry summers, there has been a significant increase in the number of affected trees and locations (Fig. 3). In Belgium, this is especially clear in the Kortrijk region. Several new locations were also reported in the Antwerp region, some of which involved a large number of infected trees. In the Netherlands, various cases were determined by Terra Nostra in 2019 and 2020, especially in the south and central regions of the country. In 2020, an exceptional location with multiple affected maples was identified in Venlo. All in all, it seems that the increase in the disease is coupled with the accumulating negative effect of repeatedly dry summers. Since sooty bark disease is not yet recognised by everyone and is not centrally reported, it is suspected that there are many more locations in both the Netherlands and Belgium. Take my recent discovery of an affected roadside tree during my recent hike in Belgium around the Maaseik area as an example (Fig. 7).

Figure 5. Strip canker Eutypa spinosa on beech. (© Henry Kuppen)

Figure 5. Strip canker Eutypa spinosa on beech. (© Henry Kuppen)

Confusion

The main characteristic of sooty bark disease is the predominantly black discolouration caused by concentrated spore formation on the trunk. However, there are other fungi that can cause black discolouration and bark- shedding. For example, the black discolouration should not be confused with the strip canker Eutypa spinosa, which can be found on beech, among other species (Fig. 5). This fungus also causes a jet-black discolouration with cracking and detaching cork cambium, but in this case far fewer spores are released.

Sometimes it is not possible to macroscopically distinguish samples with and without sooty bark disease. That is why using a microscope to analyse the spores of Cryptostroma corticale is crucial. In cases where there are no traces of this fungus, a follow up investigation is often needed. Nevertheless, by excluding sooty bark disease, large management costs can be avoided because the tree does not have to be handled in a special way. A maple in deteriorating condition with bulging cork cambium, strong black discolouration and the presence of ‘soot’ around and on the trunk are the factors that lead us to suspect sooty bark disease. Black bulges or bleeding spots on the surface of the bark are not typical characteristics.

Figure 6. Brown-green discolouration in wood caused by sooty bark disease. (© Henry Kuppen)

Figure 6. Brown-green discolouration in wood caused by sooty bark disease. (© Henry Kuppen)

Figure 7. Dieback in maple with sooty bark disease, Maaseik. (© Henry Kuppen)

Figure 7. Dieback in maple with sooty bark disease, Maaseik. (© Henry Kuppen)

Health effects and personal protection

Spores of sooty bark disease can cause chronic pneumonitis. They are a problem particularly for people who come into contact with many spores and who do not wear personal protective equipment to prevent spore inhalation. Those with an immune system disorder should avoid the immediate vicinity of an infected tree, but the majority of people who pass by do not need to worry about the disease. It is important for the tree manager not to panic but to manage the tree in a way in which safety is a high priority.

It appears that the risk of adverse health effects is still sometimes stubbornly ignored when trees with sooty bark disease are removed. As an employer, it is your duty to protect the health and safety of your employees. This means that if you know that sooty bark disease is present, you cannot get away with ignoring it. Both the client and the contractor have an obligation to share this information and to make sure that tree workers are adequately protected with proper PPE. Since sawing and lugging branches are very physical activities, wearing respiration protection that consists of an overpressure mask with a P3 filter is the most comfortable solution to safely removing a tree.

The most recent protocol issued by the Dutch national health and safety service Stigas in October 2020, drawn up with Terra Nostra and included in the Health and Safety Catalogue, gives a good picture of how personal protection should be applied when processing a tree with sooty bark disease. During processing, the tree should be kept wet as much as possible to minimise spore release. For the same reason, machined felling is preferred whenever possible.

Processing affected trees

The BVOR, the Dutch association of biowaste processors, has advised its members not to accept wood contaminated with sooty bark disease due to the risks of dispersal and spore inhalation. Burning entire branches and logs in waste incineration plants is also not a practical solution since such plants usually refuse to process unshredded material. When trees affected by sooty bark disease are processed, there is a risk that spores will spread. Processing should therefore aim to limit the drift of spores. In a residential area this may mean that it is best, if possible, for felled infected trees to be covered with a thick layer of soil. However, in many cases, this is still necessary to cover and transport infected trees in order to burn or reduce them elsewhere. Contrary to previous advice, the contaminated wood may then be reduced by a shredder or chipper, provided that it is expressly aimed at limiting the spreading of the spores. It is essential to use a machine that is adapted for this activity, including nozzles for the entire shredding and collection process, and an overpressure cabin equipped with P3 filters. A minimum of 50m has been set as the extent of a safe human-free zone around the felling or processing of contaminated materials, which means that affected trees in an uninhabited area can sometimes also be reduced on site. Any remaining spores that end up in the soil decompose quickly at warm temperatures. It has been found that 80% of spores are no longer viable after 2 weeks of summer temperatures.

Waste material

Trees infected with sooty bark disease are seen as waste. Therefore, the Eural code 020107 (forestry waste) has been designated as the most relevant. Such waste may not be buried or burned without a permit from the competent authority. Incineration of the shredded material is still possible in biomass power stations. However, they must initiate a separate work flow for this task, ensuring that employees do not run the risk of inhaling spores.

It seems clear to me that sooty bark disease can no longer be ignored. Careful attention should be paid to the correct identification of Cryptostroma corticale and to the implementation of relevant management actions. But above all, no panic should be involved.

Henry Kuppen

Henry Kuppen is a passionate Arboricultural Consultant with over 35 years of professional experience in managing trees in the urban environment. He is Director of Terra Nostra, Knowledge Center for Trees and Soils. Subscribe to Henry’s blogs at rees and Soils. Subscribe to Henry’s blogs at www.henrykuppen.nl/en and you will receive a link when a new blog is published. and you will receive a link when a new blog is published.


This article was taken from Issue 193 Summer 2021 of the ARB Magazine, which is available to view free to members by simply logging in to the website and viewing your profile area.